top of page

frisking and after

  • kewal sethi
  • Jul 6, 2020
  • 1 min read

frisking and after


US Government regrets frisking of former President of India saying, "Appropriate procedure for expedited screening of dignitaries had not been followed".


And what does our Ministry of External Affairs say about it. Here are the words – "US authorities have explained to us that under existing US regulation, former President Abdul Kalam does not fall into the category of persons exempt from security screening. However, US authorities extended usual courtesies to him at the airport, including escort and private screening".


If the usual courtsies were extended, then where was the need for apologies. Clearly the MEA is more eager than the US Government to bail out its officers. With this sort of response, we can expect even the present PM forced to remove his turban because it will be in accordance with normal(sic) behaviour of theirs.


Recent Posts

See All
serving justices,not justice

serving justices,not justice Tuesday, June 17, 2025 THE HINDU Opinion Serving justices, but not justice   Arti Raghavan   Advocatse...

 
 
 
chenghis khan advice to his sons.

chenghis khan advice to his sons. first key to leadership is self-control, particularly the mastery of pride.it is something more...

 
 
 
guilt complex

guilt complex sent by shri pradip bhargava Received in another group. Doesn't it ring several bells? Silence in the Group Chat: A Social...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page